AI Generated Content Belongs in the Public Domain

AI-Generated content should be in the public domain

AI generated content should be in the public domain — and we think most of the debate around this misses the point entirely. The question of AI content copyright ownership isn’t just for lawyers; it shapes how designers, studios, and clients think about authorship. We’ve been watching this closely, and our position is clear: if no human author can be identified, the work belongs to everyone.

March 20, 20252 Minutes

There is no stopping the Ai; questions about the ownership and copyright of AI-generated content are something we all talk about. I support the argument that such content should belong to the public domain and it cannot be copyright restrictions.

Most of us embrace the new tech (as a useful coworker) in our daily workload. But we do know that the content is not really ours. Of course, it feels great when you explore AI content and it fits your idea, but has it created something that feels original? It did, but it was trained on copyrighted material. Those artists will never be paid, they don’t even know it was taken from them—we know how the world turns. Copyright laws are made to protect creative work, but currently, our work is a mix of everything.

AI-generated content in the public domain feels like the only option. If AI-created works were freely available, we could all use them, and we could all benefit from them, as they should be easily accessible.

As AI continues to evolve, establishing clear policies on content ownership is crucial, so it will benefit society as a whole.



Don’t miss the next essay. Signup for our newsletter
⸻ Newsletter signup


Excited?


Excited clients are not a bonus — they're a design material. We've watched the same brief produce two completely different outcomes depending on whether the client came in energised or resigned. Excited client energy doesn't just make meetings easier; it changes what branding becomes possible.

Read More

First You Learn Than You Earn


Designer learning process isn't a phase — it's the foundation everything else is built on. We spent years in Ljubljana studios understanding materials, systems, and failure before a single award or client brief justified the time. The designer learning process, done honestly, is what separates work that holds from work that merely sells.

Read More

How to Rebrand Without Losing Your Audience


Rebranding without losing your audience is less about design decisions and more about sequencing them. Every rebrand we've led starts with the same question: what does your audience actually recognise you by — and is that the thing you're planning to change? Getting that wrong is how you rebrand without losing your audience on paper, but quietly lose them anyway.

Read More

Trends burn bright, but they burn fast.


Trends burn fast — that's not a warning, it's a design principle we've worked from since 2004. Every identity we've built across 128 projects starts from the same question: what survives the cycle? Trends burn fast, but a mark built on meaning doesn't need a refresh every eighteen months.

Read More

I take it personally


Personal investment in branding is not a policy we adopted — it's the only way we know how to work. Every project that has left this studio since 2004 carries some part of us in it, for better or worse. That personal investment in branding is what separates a mark that lasts from one that simply gets approved.

Read More

Discipline vs. Talent in Design


Discipline vs talent in design is a question we stopped debating around our tenth year of practice. Not because talent is irrelevant — it isn't — but because discipline is the only thing that shows up on deadline, survives a difficult client, and compounds across twenty years of work. We've built 81 logos and earned over 80 awards on that premise, and the evidence keeps arriving.

Read More

Every Element Has a Job


Every element has a job — or it doesn't belong on the page. That's the single discipline that has shaped our work since 2004. When purposeful graphic design is the standard, nothing survives by accident: not the weight of a comma, not the gap between two blocks of colour. Every element has a job, and we've spent two decades making sure each one earns it.

Read More

Remember when you learned to spot a stock photo?


You could see it from a mile away. The same thing is happening now. We are growing up developing an even sharper instinct for what feels generated, repeated, predictable, and empty.

Read More



Ljubljana
--:--:--

London
--:--:--

New York
--:--:--

Tokyo
--:--:--




Red Dot

Two Red Dots. Two completely different projects. One thing in common — the fingerprints of people who refused to settle. What does an award actually prove?

Read More

Definition of a brand

Definition of a brand is where most projects quietly fail — not in execution, but in understanding. A brand is not a logo, not a palette, not a tagline. It is the gap between what a company says it…

Read More

We use craft in every project. Not as decoration. Not as nostalgia. As a way of thinking.

Craft in design thinking is how we structure every decision we make — not what it looks like at the end, but how the problem gets interrogated from the start. We've been working this way since 2004.…

Read More

What Does a Branding Agency Actually Do?

What does a branding agency do — and what separates the ones worth hiring from the ones who just make things look nice? We've been answering that question through work since 2004. What does a…

Read More



Copyright © 2004 ⸻ 2026. Visual Brain Gravity is a design studio in Ljubljana, Slovenia. Specializing in brand identity systems and structured visual design.. ⸻ contact us at hello@vbg.si.

46.0459986°N ,14.5086705°E
Good design is for good clients. Privacy policy