Good design is for good clients
Good design and good clients arrive together — one rarely exists without the other. After two decades and 128 projects in Ljubljana, we’ve stopped pretending otherwise. The work only reaches its potential when the relationship is built on honesty, mutual respect, and a shared willingness to sit with the hard decisions.
We have had this signature for a long time. And it is still valid. Perhaps the only thing that changed since then is that we have changed the client’s term to friends.
It is a bit provocative to debate who is a good client. This is one hard definition, isn’t it?
We could say that good clients understand the importance of design and recognize its value in creating a successful product or service.
A definition from a dreadfully boring book where we are still looking for those who appreciate the impact of the design. We don’t expect everyone to understand, and that’s okay. Appreciation and understanding are things we work on and educate those who step in. A long discussion or a workshop usually helps to get everyone involved on the same track.
But more importantly, it all comes down to loyalty, trust, and understanding. Those big words must be mutual, and we need to build that relationship with them. Sometimes, for introverts like myself, this is harder than making the right decision with the design concept and direction. All creatives have the same issue; we just want to work. The only way I can get over that is if we manage to define the relationship as a friendship—they are there to help, encourage, and support you.
What Good Design Actually Requires from Good Clients
See how client relationships shape the logos we buildDon’t miss the next essay. Signup for our newsletter
⸻ Newsletter signup
You thought it would hold.
Brand consistency breakdown rarely announces itself. It arrives as a slightly wrong typeface, a colour that's close but not right, a logo scaled by someone who didn't know why the padding existed. We've spent two decades watching brands we built with precision quietly come apart — not through malice, but through the ordinary entropy of handoff.
Discipline vs. Talent in Design
Discipline vs talent in design is a question we stopped debating around our tenth year of practice. Not because talent is irrelevant — it isn't — but because discipline is the only thing that shows up on deadline, survives a difficult client, and compounds across twenty years of work. We've built 81 logos and earned over 80 awards on that premise, and the evidence keeps arriving.
I take it personally
Personal investment in branding is not a policy we adopted — it's the only way we know how to work. Every project that has left this studio since 2004 carries some part of us in it, for better or worse. That personal investment in branding is what separates a mark that lasts from one that simply gets approved.
Art is Provocation: Raising Questions, without Giving Answers
Art is provocation — and that alone makes it fundamentally different from design. Where design resolves, art destabilises. We've spent two decades navigating that tension, and art is provocation precisely because it refuses the comfort of conclusions.
How Much Does Branding Cost?
Branding cost is the question every client asks first, and it's almost always the wrong place to start. We've worked through 128 projects since 2004, and the budget conversation only makes sense after we understand what the brand actually needs to do. Branding cost without that context is just a number with nothing holding it up.
Sometimes we all need a little push
Need a little push before you can finally commit to a branding project? We've heard that hesitation hundreds of times — and it rarely has anything to do with budget. After 20 years and 81 logos, we've learned that the thing holding most businesses back isn't readiness. It's the wrong idea of what readiness looks like. Sometimes all it takes is someone telling you: you're closer than you think.
The Why
Brand why statement is the first question we ask — before color, form, or name. Not because it's fashionable to talk about purpose, but because a brand built without a clear why collapses under its own aesthetic eventually. We've seen it. Defining your brand why statement early is the structural decision that holds everything else together.
Should designers code?
Should designers code? We've been asking ourselves that question since 2004 — across identities, interfaces, and campaigns where design met production head-on. The answer depends entirely on what kind of designer you want to be, and what kind of work you want to make. Should designers code is the wrong binary; the real question is how much of the medium should you understand before you hand it off.